The Anti Neo-Democracy Theorist

Entries from January 2008

Singapore and the America’s Primaries

January 29, 2008 · 2 Comments

225px-papcandidates_1959.jpg

Source: Answers.com/A group that promised change in Singapore in the 1960s

demdebate0607.jpg

Source:  Blogedweek.com/Another group that promises change in America in 2008

Quote of the Day:

How can the outside world, how can reasonable people anywhere, not be impressed with the choices and the seriousness with which millions of Americans have now taken those choices?

- Justin Webb, BBC North American Editor

For Singapore, the primaries election has inspired some bloggers to draw inspiration, especially from the Obama campaign. While the protection of privacies and civil liberties, the opening of the Singapore polity, the closing of the widening income gap, and developing institutions for accountable governance directly from the ordinary people has faced much difficulties since the Lee Hsien Loong regime, Singaporeans rightly are able to draw some inspirations from the American primaries. Particularly, the dazzling campaign of Obama, which has gotten so many young people in America interested in politics again, leaves room for hope for a similar outcome in Singapore among young people. The widespread disdain of political participation in Singapore by young people, out of disgust, fear, ignorance, apathy, materialism and self-interest, has plagued both the governing and opposition parties. Of course, the largest gain for political participation seemed to be in the civil society, where groups not affliated to established political parties are making their voices heard. To some Singaporeans, this could be a fertile ground for an Singapore Obama to rise up and challenge the political establishment.

Another possible rise of an inspiring politician in Singapore could ironically come from its new immigrants, whose own background in countries with higher levels of political awareness would propel them to contribute to the country in a dynamic and uncontrollable (from the establishment’s view) way.

It would be such a waste of good political talent if the Singapore government does not seize the opportunity in a stable and prosperous polity to reform the electoral system, create avenues for independent media and pluralize the proliferation of civil society. If our political talents would to leave the country and later re-emerge in Australia, Taiwan, the Americas and the United Kingdom as their politicians, there will be nothing but anguish for our people.

While Americas is plagued with similar problems as Singapore such as a downturn in economy, rise in credit card debts, an ageing population, and widening income gap, it is refreshing for once to see soaring rates in primary participations. More Americans are voting in their primaries than usual, signaling a strong interest in their elections. My predication is that the next general election will see more than 60% of all Americans voting, which will be a historical high since a few decades ago. More importantly, more Americans have decided that one of the many candidates are able to deliver on their promises of change, which has somewhat restored confidence in the political system in the United States.

(more…)

Categories: Accountability · American Politics · Politics · World

Did Tharman put an egg on the parliament’s face?

January 27, 2008 · 5 Comments

inderjitsingh.jpg

The hero in the GIC/Temasek Saga (Source:NTU)

Sometime ago, I wrote two posts arguing for the importance of parliamentary accountability in the Temasek and GIC deal. Apparently, MP Inderjit Singh raised the question of the deal in parliament. As other bloggers have pointed out, the reply by Tharman was basically

1) I can’t comment cos is their business

2) We have full trust in Temasek and GIC

Asking Singaporeans to have blind faith in Temasek and GIC instead of having an informed faith is quite troubling. Informed faith suggest that Singaporeans don’t have to know everything, but for us to be reassured that the government has indeed consulted with Temasek and GIC on the deals and has good reasons for their faith and trust in the latter institutions. If the PAP government can give detail replies on sensitive issues such as income gap, Internal security department arrests, health care issues, defense issues etc etc, is giving more information on the GIC/Temasek deal so difficult? Even if the GIC and Temasek have little to do with the operations of the government, was it impossible for the PAP government to comment constructively on them, given that they comment on things ranging from spitting in toilets to the election of new leaders in South Africa. More importantly, is the PAP creating a bad precedent for parliamentary accountability? If the deal is so good, why hide the information from the people?

(more…)

Categories: Parliament

Obama Bests Clinton in S.C. race

January 27, 2008 · 3 Comments

_44382681_clinton203getty.jpg_44383921_obamaflag_ap203b.jpg

Source: BBC News
This win is quite overwhelming for Obama. How will Clinton handle the fact that more than 80% of African Americans supported Obama? What is crucial for Hilary is that 66% of African American women went with Obama, focusing on their race over gender. In the meantime, Can Obama recover from his weak 25% support among white voters to become the nominee for the Democratic Party?

Categories: American Politics

New York Times endorses Hilary and John

January 25, 2008 · No Comments

I am surprised how much I agreed with the NYT editoral supporting Hilary Clinton and John McCain in this race. It also shows how much I value well-thought out economic policies, tax cuts for the middle class (addendum), moderation in immigration policy and a compassionate social welfare policy in a democratic country. However, I do think Hilary needs to be able to enlist some sort of help to appeal to the independents who interestingly vote for Obama even though they did support her in the Iowa caucus. By energizing the democratic base to vote for her at the peril of neglecting the independent, will she have a hard time facing John McCain? Also, I do not share NYT criticism of Matt Romney because John McCain experiences in economic policies is frankly an unknown.

Rudy is in a terrible state - but appearing so conservative (even Huckabee is trying to broaden his appeal), how can he have any hopes of winning the Presidency? What happen to his moderate stances in his campaign for NY mayor? Is his florida campaign going to pay off
My prediction in this very early stages of who will win the presidency:

Clinton versus Rudy G. = Clinton

Clinton versus John McCain = too close to call

Clinton versus Romney = too close to call

Clinton versus Huckabee = Clinton

Obama versus Rudy G. = Obama

Obama versus John McCain = John McCain

Obama versus Romney = too close to call

Obama versus Huckabee = too close to call

The New York Times

January 25, 2008 Friday

Primary Choices

This generally is the stage of a campaign when Democrats have to work hard to get excited about whichever candidate seems most likely to outlast an uninspiring pack. That is not remotely the case this year.

The early primaries produced two powerful main contenders: Hillary Clinton, the brilliant if at times harsh-sounding senator from New York; and Barack Obama, the incandescent if still undefined senator from Illinois. The remaining long shot, John Edwards, has enlivened the race with his own brand of raw populism.

As Democrats look ahead to the primaries in the biggest states on Feb. 5, The Times’s editorial board strongly recommends that they select Hillary Clinton as their nominee for the 2008 presidential election.

(more…)

Categories: American Politics

真挚–郑中基 (1990s Song)

January 25, 2008 · No Comments

This song from the nineties suddenly came to my head as I walked back to my dorm in the -25 degrees cold. There was a sudden urge to hum this song. 在美国走的路不容易,但”有朋友我不孤独.”

I still remember when I was in Sec 2, I went for an exchange program to New Zealand. We sang this song as a symbol of friendship to our new friends. It was a little cheesy then (who can forget the 90s cheesiness with Emil Chau and Zheng Zhong Ji before Jay Chou and May Day ushered in the 21st century)

I immediately went to google the song and couldn’t find it on youtube. But I found it on the Chinese search engine - Baidu.

Cheers to Friendship and enjoy the song!

http://video.baidu.com/p?word=%D5%E6%D6%BF&pos=2&s=1

Also I came across the SBC News in Chinese on youtube. Brings back memories.

Categories: Personal

Clinton triumphs in the CNN/MSNBC Democratic Party Debate in South Carolina - not to CNN though

January 22, 2008 · No Comments

galldebatefinalgi.jpg

Credits: CNN.com

I thought Clinton easily won tonights’ debate. She was calm, clear and had a coherent economic policy. Her health care plans were much more comprehensive than that of Obama and Edwards. More importantly, she was focused on the task at hand and looked presidential.

Therefore, I was mystified at the anti-clinton bias on CNN/pro-Edwards bias on CNN.

My friend watching the debate with me also expressed the same view.

Why should a debate non-partisan as CNN argued? It doesn’t make sense. A debate is suppose to be a DEBATE, not a declaration of boring speeches on the floor of the congress. Has the CNN ever watch Prime Minister Questions in the House of Commons in the UK? Now that’s partisanship for the Americans.

MSNBC has a much better analysis of the debate.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/21/596683.aspx

From NBC’s Chuck Todd
This was easily the most heated debate to date. The candidates, particularly Obama and Clinton were, well, angry and it got personal. Obama, in particular, seemed to have a lot he wanted to get off his chest.

Obama spent the early part of the night on the defensive, which I’m guessing, wasn’t the game plan. Of course, when you’re the candidate under fire, it usually means you’re the candidate ahead. And in South Carolina, he’s probably ahead. Still, Obama was constantly under attack by both Clinton and, to a degree, Edwards.

Also, Obama consistently got caught in a debate trap by responding to every charge with an explanation. It’s a standup thing to do on one hand, but it ends up putting Obama off message; and it allows for the attack to get more air time rather than the original point or message Obama meant to be heard. Clinton, in contrast, rarely answers a charge directly and instead deflects by counter-punching, which shows her discipline.

Obama seemed to get that he got a bit too hot because in the second part of the debate, he refused a new chance to go after Bill Clinton a second time. But the campaign probably believes they showed that he’s tough enough and they did want to continue to push the idea that the Clintons will say and do anything to win. BTW, Obama was particularly strong in the second part of the debate. His answers on religion and his national security rebuttal to Clinton were very good. The strong second half performance will blunt any potential negative backlash he received in the first part.
(more…)

Categories: American Politics

Happy MLK Jr. day!

January 22, 2008 · No Comments

On Martin Luther King Jr. Day, five quotes for everyone:

Whatever your life’s work is, do it well. A man should do his job so well that the living, the dead, and the unborn could do it no better.

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.

A right delayed is a right denied. 

The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people. 

And finally: (more…)

Categories: Society

Perhaps the best campaign victory speech I saw

January 20, 2008 · 4 Comments

34829318.jpg

Credits: Newsday 

“We will be united in November to beat the Republicans… I don’t politics is a game, I don’t think election is just another day in the calender, I think it really matters the decision we make to determine what kind of opportunities and futures all you and your families can have. I am going to make the commitment in this campaign to make the real choices, about an economy that works or doesn’t work, for hardworking people and I saw a lot of them cross Nevada; people who are worried, but determined. It really matters whether we finally get universe health care for every single man, women and child, it matters that we stop treating immigration like a football game and fix it. I know people who came up to me, grab my hand and whisper in my year, “Please, my son is in Iraq, my husband is in Iraq, bring them home and I WILL!”

-Hilary speaking during her victory speech at the Nevada Caucus

Hilary Clinton gave probably her best campaign victory speech ever.. I think she might just be the next President of the United States of America.(Click on the Nevada speech to see her video on CNN)

Will we have ever such inspiring politicians in Singapore since Mr. Lee Kuan Yew, who believed in a better way to run Singapore in a fairer, liberal and more democratic polity when he was first elected to the House in the 1950s?

Are we so cynical that we believe things will never change?

Categories: American Politics

Thoughts on the US primaries (Part II)

January 19, 2008 · No Comments

Latest Update: Clinton projected to win Nevada caucus.CNN

Latest Update 2: Fox News: Polls showed 52 percent of women, 61 percent of seniors and 64 percent of Hispanics voted for the New York senator, who notched an upset victory in the New Hampshire primary Jan. 8 on the backs of some of the same voting groups.

Watching the live feed of Democratic Caucus from the Nevada caucus. One caucus site showed a majority for Obama even though pre-voting opinion polls show Clinton leading. Not sure whether caucuses benefit Obama more because those caucusing for him seem to have louder and younger voices as compared to the distinctly older crowd for clinton.

The tension is so much in the air even in my college. Several of my American friends have refused to tell me whether they support Obama or Clinton. Apparently no Edwards supporter. Most have not decided who to back for the primaries. Those who have openly declared their support are mostly Obama supporters. Obama stickers are floating around and T-shirts have been distributed. But they remain a minority as compared to those supporting John Kerry over Bush in the 2004 election.

The Lunch lady is wearing her Clinton badge proudly everyday. She is around 60 years old;

Should be an interesting year ahead. If Clinton wins the Nevada caucus, it would at least mitigate the almost certain loss in South Carolina to Obama (and close the losing percentage). If she loses badly, it could mean Obama would be the comeback kid.

The AP reflected on the Republican turnout where Matt Romney easily cruised to victory (apparently the Karl Rove effect is running out on the G.O.P),

(more…)

Categories: American Politics

Commendable ideas for change in public transport by the government

January 18, 2008 · No Comments

Very commendable ideas by the government to move forward in public transport. Let’s wait for the details now. But what about the issues of taxi hikes?

SINGAPORE: Major changes are expected in land transport after a more than year-long review to improve the situation.

In the first three major announcements, Transport Minister Raymond Lim zoomed in on changes to the bus system, which serves two-thirds of all commuter trips today.

Speaking at the opening of the Land Transport Authority (LTA) gallery, he outlined the urgency of the problem, stressing that with trips poised to increase 60 per cent between now and 2020, the only option is to steer people towards using public transport more often.

For that to happen, Mr Lim said, not just the quantity, but also the quality of public transport would have to improve tremendously.
(more…)

Categories: transport